Hi Tom, I agree to a certain extent. There is certainly nothing in the philosophy of Intelligent Design that would qualify it as a scientific theory. On the other hand the Dishonesty Institute publish propaganda for schools directly calling it - "The theory of intelligent design: A briefing packet for educators" - followed by a "Teach the controversy" picture of Charles Darwin - see the linked file http://tinyurl.com/6bfqbp It follows on from the Wedge document which said the following. "We are building on this momentum, broadening the wedge with a positive scientific alternative to materialistic scientific theories, which has come to be called the theory of intelligent design."
Friday: Hili dialogue
-
Welcome to the tail end of the week: Friday, August 8, 2025, and National
Mochi Day. Although it’s a day of cultural appropriation, I happen to love
mochi,...
Thank you
-
This is my last post for the Bad Astronomy Blog on Discover Magazine. As of
today – Monday, November 12, 2012 – the blog has a new home at Slate
magazine...
2 comments:
Just a little bit of nit-picking.
This contains the phrase "theory of Intelligent Design".
There is no such theory.
There is a long tradition in anti-evolutionism that it avoid any substantive, positive content, and the ID version has "perfected" this strategy.
Tom S.
Hi Tom, I agree to a certain extent. There is certainly nothing in the philosophy of Intelligent Design that would qualify it as a scientific theory.
On the other hand the Dishonesty Institute publish propaganda for schools directly calling it - "The theory of intelligent design:
A briefing packet for educators"
- followed by a "Teach the controversy" picture of Charles Darwin - see the linked file
http://tinyurl.com/6bfqbp
It follows on from the Wedge document which said the following.
"We are building on this momentum, broadening the wedge with a positive scientific alternative to materialistic scientific theories, which has come to be called the theory of intelligent design."
Post a Comment